In the Nature vs Nurture framework, which view holds that language is innate?

Prepare for your Language Disorders Exam 1. Utilize our flashcards and multiple choice questions with hints and explanations. Ace your exam!

Multiple Choice

In the Nature vs Nurture framework, which view holds that language is innate?

Explanation:
Language being innate comes from the nature side, which holds there is an inborn language faculty. Proponents argue that children acquire complex grammar rapidly and creatively even with limited explicit instruction, hinting at universal grammar or an innate capacity that guides language development. This view is supported by observations like similar developmental sequences across diverse languages and the existence of a critical period for language learning. In contrast, nurture emphasizes learning through exposure and experience; behaviorist theories frame language as a set of behaviors shaped by reinforcement, and pragmatics concerns how language is used in social situations rather than whether it is inborn. Hence, innateness aligns with the natural, biological view of language.

Language being innate comes from the nature side, which holds there is an inborn language faculty. Proponents argue that children acquire complex grammar rapidly and creatively even with limited explicit instruction, hinting at universal grammar or an innate capacity that guides language development. This view is supported by observations like similar developmental sequences across diverse languages and the existence of a critical period for language learning. In contrast, nurture emphasizes learning through exposure and experience; behaviorist theories frame language as a set of behaviors shaped by reinforcement, and pragmatics concerns how language is used in social situations rather than whether it is inborn. Hence, innateness aligns with the natural, biological view of language.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy